1.3 billion killed, maimed, or diseased by nuclear activities.

Jan Hemmer’s blog has an excellent post about the fake science on radiation harm that has been undertaken since the Japanese atomic bombings.

Your DNA is continuously injured and tapestry of diseases overwhelms your body. CANCER is NOT the point at all. All we care is QOL(Quality Of Life) for 20-30 years and GENERATIONS… The Internal Emitter damages all the DNA’s not only human, but trees, grasses, insects, birds, animals, fishes…EVERY LIFE and Environments…

Nagasawa and Little have noticed that alpha-particles already a doses as low as 0,3 mGy leads to significant increase in frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese Hamster ovary cells…

800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing!

There is also a link to an outstanding article by Dr. Rosalie Bertell. With conservative assumptions on the rate of genetic abnormalities transmitted to offspring, she comes up with 1,300 million victims of the nuclear age (up to 1999).

She comments on the way the IAEA and other “radiation protection” agencies undercount the human victims of radiation:

-If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures.
-If a cancer is initiated by another carcinogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.
-If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.
-Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count.
-A congenitally blind, deaf, or malformed child whose illnesses are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.
-Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a ‘serious genetic disease’ in the Mendelian sense.
-Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live-born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv.
-Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes – in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.
-If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached.

More on the 39 scams perpetrated by the radiation protection agencies can be found at “The Betrayal of Mankind by the Radiation Protection Agencies”.

One thought on “1.3 billion killed, maimed, or diseased by nuclear activities.

  1. In 16 years from 1989 to 2005, French researchers have noted a net decrease of 34.6% in the number of sperm which fell from 76.3 to 49.9 million per cm3. This implies an exponential decay of mean-Ln (1-34.60%) / 16 = 2.65% per annum. If this degeneration remains at the rate of 2.65% per annum without wasting worsen the critical fertility situated around 40 million sperm per cm3 will be reached around 2013. (Ln (4.99 E7 / E7 4.00) / Ln (1 .0265) ≈ 8 years.) Infertility, effective around 20 million sperm per cm3, in turn is expected around 2040. (Ln (4.99 E7 / E7 2.00) / Ln (1 .0265) ≈ 35.) Men in 2012 probably already lost 1 – (EXP ((2012-1989) * -2.65%) ) ≈ 45.7% of fertile potential they had in 1989.

    http://www.aipri.blogspot.com/2012/12/foutu-sperme-ou-la-debandade-de-la.html (French)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *